Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Perkins v. Utecht
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 29, 1950No. 35,385PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner appeals from an order of the district court for Washington county denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal upon the grounds that all questions raised by the present petition were decided and determined against petitioner by this court in State ex rel. Perkins v. Utecht, 231 Minn. 339, 43 N. W. (2d) 258, and that the petition is sham and frivolous and shows on its face that it has no merit.
We considered all the questions raised by the present petition in our former opinion. There, we affirmed a previous order of the Washington county…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Dufault v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Johnson v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Callaghan v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Guy v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Kennedy v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Becker v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Campbell v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Adams v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Dixon v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954