Legal Opinion
Matchan v. Phoenix Land Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 17, 1924No. 23,792PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action to set aside certain conveyances and to have the real estate in question declared the property of First National Holding Company. After trial by the court and a decision adverse to defendant Phoenix Land Investment Company, it made a motion for a new trial, from the denial of which it appeals.
Extended consideration of the facts is unnecessary, but the record is so lengthy and involved that a mere effort to bring out its high lights may seem like extended statement, although the fact will be to the contrary.
The property consists of two lots in Minneapolis upon which are situated the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Linn & Lane Timber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mackellar v. PillsburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Bannon v. BowlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Macfadden v. JenkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- Dyson v. St. Paul National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Di Re v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- In Re Trust Under Will of ClarkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- G.G.C. Co. v. First National Bank of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Lake Park Development Co. v. Paul Steenberg Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.