Legal Opinion

Investors Security Co. v. Bohanon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 15, 1926No. 25,515PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tayloe, O.

This is an appeal from an order striking out an answer and counterclaim as sham and frivolous. Defendant is engaged in the business of excavating and marketing sand and gravel. In October, 1922, he entered into a contract with plaintiff for the purchase of six lots in the city of Minneapolis for the sum of $7,000 of which he paid $500 in cash and for the remaining $6,500 gave four promissory notes of $1,625 each, payable respectively in one, two, three and four years. It was understood that lie was buying tbe property for a sand pit and tbe contract gave bim tbe right to remove and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of Richards v. SheasgreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. Towne v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Knudson v. PedersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Simons v. CowanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Minneapolis Holding Co. v. MatchanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Commander Milling Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  4. Washington Lubricating Co. v. American Sales Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API