Legal Opinion
Dunbar v. Foxx
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2013-0872PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Nadra Dunbar, proceeding pro se, brings this employment discrimination Complaint against the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”), a component of the Department of Transportation (“DOT”). Dunbar alleges that NHTSA retaliated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, and 42 U.S.C. Sec tion 1981. (Third Am. Compl. pp. 1, 24-31). She asserts that this alleged retaliatory conduct escalated to the point where she experienced a hostile work environment and…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Behrens v. TillersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Assaad v. CarsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Chan Chan v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Dunbar v. FoxxDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Manus v. HaydenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020