Legal Opinion

Kuykendall v. Johnson Funeral Parlor

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1931No. 7558PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaugh, J.

Suit by Kuykendall and wife, plaintiffs below, against appellee for damages for the death of their minor son, killed at San Angelo, Tex., by an ambulance of appellee, while answering an emergency call. The jury found that the death resulted from .an unavoidable accident, judgment was for defendant, and plaintiffs have appealed.

Appellants present three contentions, none of which are sustained. The first is that there was no evidence on which to submit the issue of unavoidable accident, and that the finding of the jury thereon was against the undisputed evidence. The following facts appear:…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Texas Midland R.R. Co. v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Parker v. BaileyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Humble Pipe Line Co. v. KincaidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Miks v. LeathCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ross v. Houston Oil Fields Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Daggett v. CornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Pete-Rae Development Company v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Universal Atlas Cement Co. v. OswaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Rissell v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API