Legal Opinion

Rissell v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 17, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff sued under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U. S. C., Secs. 51-59) for a violation of the Federal Safety Appliance Act (45 U. S. C., Secs. 2, 8).

In substance the petition, charged that plaintiff was an employee of defendant as brakeman; that at the time of the injury the defendant was engaged and the plaintiff employed in interstate commerce, and that the injury was caused by defendant using a ear not equipped with a coupler and coupling device which would couple automatically by impact and without the necessity of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Osborne v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. State v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Frohman v. LowensteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  4. Jarvis v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Shidloski v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hogue v. WurdackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Graham Ex Rel. Bodine v. ConnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Talley v. BuchananSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  4. Ahmann v. KemperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API