Legal Opinion

La Verl Bailey and Charles R. Smith v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1967No. 24158PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge:

We are again faced with determining the constitutional validity of a seizure of illegally imported narcotics. The District Court denied appellants’ motion to suppress heroin and paraphernalia seized from them by United States Customs Officers. Rule 41(e), F.R.Crim.P. Their trial was to a jury, and appellants were convicted of violating the federal prohibitions against concealing and transporting illegally imported narcotics and purchasing narcotics not from the original stamped package. 21 U.S.C. Sec. 174; 26 U.S.C. Sec. 4704. In addition to contesting the legality of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. Dr. Luther Lewis Ashley, Jr., and John Franklin RoperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Brian A. Anderson, Richard Quentin Felts, and Paul William Spicer,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. James Lee WorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Oscar Squella-AvendanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Iris Collette Jackson Dwight Dean JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API