Legal Opinion

Krumbine v. Lebanon County Tax Claim Bureau

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 1995PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

This case presents the issue of whether the Real Estate Tax Sale Law (the “Tax Sale Law”), 72 P.S. § 5860.101 et seq., requires individual notification of a pending tax sale of real estate to each of the three persons listed on the deed to the real estate, each of whom are the trustees of the real estate for an unincorporated association. For the reasons set forth below, we find that the Tax Sale Law does require separate notification under such circumstances. Since appellant, the Lebanon County Tax Claim Bureau, failed to give individual notification to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Selected Risks Insurance Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Teslovich v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. In Re Appeal of Marple Springfield Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Treaster v. Union TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Geier v. Tax Claim BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stanford-Gale v. Tax Claim Bureau of Susquehanna CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Farro v. Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Bargo v. KuhnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. FS Partners v. York County TCB and T.R. SteeleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. AK Steel Corp. v. Viacom, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API