Legal Opinion

Treaster v. Union Township

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1968No. Appeal, 90PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

This is another appeal generated by the never-ending search of our local municipalities to seek addition al sources of tax revenue to meet their budgetary needs. In this search they have found a willing ally in the General Assembly which, over two decades ago, enacted the Act of June 25, 1947, P. L. 1145, the so-called “Act 481” or “Tax Anything Act.” This Act conferred broad taxing powers on the local subdivisions, powers limited generally only by the existence of state tax impositions (and even then not always) and the local imagination and specifically only by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Harris-Walsh, Inc. v. Dickson City BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Seligsohn AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Rose Township v. HollobaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. MASTRANGELO v. BUCKLEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Platek v. PlatekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. DarushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Busy Beaver Building Centers, Inc. v. TuecheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. A. Scott Enterprises v. City of Allentown, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API