Legal Opinion
Shatz v. TEC Technical Adhesives
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 13, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
174 N.J. Super. 135 (1980)
415 A.2d 1188
RAYMOND SHATZ AND DORIS SHATZ, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
TEC TECHNICAL ADHESIVES, A DIVISION OF THE H.B. FULLER COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND CARUSO MASONRY CORPORATION, LOUIS J. GIACOMOZZI T/A LOU'S ELECTRIC, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted April 28, 1980.
Decided May 13, 1980.
Before Judges BISCHOFF, BOTTER and MORTON I. GREENBERG.
Michael J. Izzo, Jr., attorney for appellants.
Montano, Summers, Mullen & Manuel, attorneys for respondent (G. Wesley Manuel, Jr. on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Cartel Capital Corp. v. Fireco of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Braitman v. Overlook Terrace Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Rempfer v. Deerfield Packing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Theobald v. AngelosSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tanner v. ShoupeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Koruba v. American Honda Motor Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Molino v. BF Goodrich Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Ladner v. Mercedes-BenzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Dixon v. Jacobsen Mfg. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.