Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Jacobsen Mfg. Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 2, 1994PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

270 N.J. Super. 569 (1994)

637 A.2d 915

KENNETH DIXON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

JACOBSEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON, INC., HOMELITE DIVISION OF TEXTRON, INC., TEXTRON, INC., JOHN DOE AND XYZ CORPORATION, SAID NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

RICHARD P. DIXON AND NANCY J. DIXON, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 28, 1993.

Decided February 2, 1994.

Before Judges STERN, KEEFE and BILDER.

Jeffrey R. Youngman argued the cause for appellant (Karas, Kilstein, Hirschklau, Feitlin, Kopf & Baime, attorneys).

Dana C.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Cover v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Walton v. Avco Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Brown v. United States Stove Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lewis v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Lewis v. American Cyanamid Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  3. Costantino v. VentrigliaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  4. Grier v. Cochran Western Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  5. Wilson v. United States Elevator Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API