Legal Opinion

Tanner v. Shoupe

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 20, 1999No. 97-1566PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

This is a products liability case involving an automobile battery that exploded and injured Greg Tanner. Tanner appeals the order granting Exide Corporation's motion for a directed verdict after Tanner presented his case to the jury, and the resulting judgment. There are two issues: (1) did the trial court erroneously exercise its discretion in refusing to allow Tanner's expert witness to testify, and (2) did the trial court err in directing a verdict in favor of Exide on Tanner's claims for strict liability and negligence. We conclude the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Morgan v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Grace L. Cummins v. Lyle IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Sumnicht v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Morden v. Continental AGWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In re Zimmer, Nexgen Knee Implant Prods. Liab. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. State v. St. GeorgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Godoy Ex Rel. Gramling v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Hennig v. AhearnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API