Legal Opinion
Molino v. BF Goodrich Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 18, 1992PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
261 N.J. Super. 85 (1992)
617 A.2d 1235
BRUNO MOLINO AND NERINA MOLINO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, ANTHONY DEBIASSE, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A HICKORY TREE GARAGE, RIDGE TIRE & AUTO CENTER, MORRISTOWN TIRE CO., INC., JOHN DOE CORPORATION, AND JOHN DOE, INDIVIDUALLY, SAID DOES BEING FICTITIOUS AND UNKNOWN ENTITIES OR PERSONS, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 30, 1992.
Decided December 18, 1992.
Before Judges SHEBELL, A.M. STEIN, and CONLEY.
William H. Sheil argued the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Buckelew v. GrossbardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kane v. Hartz Mountain IndustriesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Koruba v. American Honda Motor Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Dixon v. Jacobsen Mfg. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Graves v. Church & Dwight Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Hughes v. A.W. Chesterton Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.