Legal Opinion
City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 8, 1980No. Civ. A. C75-560PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KRUPANSKY, District Judge.
This matter is presently before the Court on the plaintiff City of Cleveland’s motion to disqualify the Honorable Robert B. Krupansky pursuant to the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 455 (Supp.1979). Defendant Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company has responded in opposition.
A review of the applicable authorities discloses that this tribunal has an affirmative obligation to assess in the first instance the legal sufficiency of the motion at bar and the…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Harry Greenspan, AKA Alfred A. Lugo, AKA Alfred Anthony Lugo, AKA Alex Lugo, AKA Alex StoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Gloria Delesdernier, Wife of Clay N. Gerald v. Louis B. PorterieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- In Re WHET, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983
- In Re City of Detroit, Detroit Water and Sewerage DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.