Legal Opinion

Arturo J. Atehortua v. Thomas Kindt, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 17, 1991No. 90-2805PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFEY, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-appellant Arturo J. Atehortua appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Atehortua claims that the sentence imposed for his possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 is subject to collateral attack. We vacate the district court’s denial of this habeas petition for lack of jurisdiction.

I

Title 21, U.S.C. § 841 makes it a crime to possess cocaine with intent to distribute.1 On October 27, 1986, the United States Congress amended 21 U.S.C. § 841. Before the amendment, a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. Andrew Ford, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Arturo Jesus AtehortuaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. James J. Valona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Larry Joe Carnine, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Christopher Alan AlmandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Samuel L. Eakman, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Michael W. GiltnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API