Legal Opinion
Redland Water District v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 22, 1983No. 1789; CA A24265PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
This case involves the merger of three water districts by an order of the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission. The Redland Water District wants no part of the merger and seeks review of that order. ORS 199.461(3). We affirm.
The water districts involved are contiguous and are located in Clackamas County. Each was established under ORS chapter 264, and each has functioned since its formation as an independent district governed by an elected board. In 1979, the districts discussed the possibility of merger. Clairmont and Holcomb-Outlook favored the change; Redland did…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Warren v. MARION COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Braidwood v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- City of Wood Village v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- City of Wood Village v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dimone v. City of HillsboroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Multnomah County Rural Fire Protection District No. 10 v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994