Legal Opinion
Braidwood v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 23, 1976No. 399-418, CA 4873PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFort, P. J.
In this writ of review proceeding the trial court held that the Portland City Council’s denial of plaintiffs’ requested zone change was not supported by reliable, probative and substantial evidence. Defendant City appeals from the court’s order setting aside the council’s action and directing that the City grant the zone change. It asserts that the council’s findings were supported by the required quantum of evidence.
Plaintiffs requested a zone change for 2.7 acres from A2.5 (apartment residential zone) to C2 (general commercial zone), later changing their request to part C2 and part C2B…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Bay v. State Board of EducationOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Western Amusement Co., Inc. v. City of SpringfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Auckland v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF MULTNOMAHCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Dickinson v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS, CLACKAMAS CTY.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bureau of LaborCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Christian Retreat Center v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Neuberger v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Baker v. City of WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.