City of Wood Village v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
SCHWAB, C. J.
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
Petitioner, City of Wood Village, has filed an appeal from a decision of the respondent boundary commission. Now before us is petitioner’s motion for a stay of the boundary commission’s order of annexation from which petitioner has appealed.
As required by Von Weidlein/N. W. Bottling v. OLCC, 16 Or App 81, 514 P2d 560, 515 P2d 936, 517 P2d 295 (1973), rev den (1974), petitioner first sought a stay from the boundary commission. The commission replied that it lacked authority to issue a stay because of new statutes enacted last year. We conclude the boundary commission, at least in this case,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Von Weidlein International, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Von Weidlein International, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- League of Women Voters of Central Lane County v. Lane County Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3Cited by2 opinions
- Redland Water District v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Consolidated Metco, Inc. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984