Legal Opinion
Herrington v. County of Sonoma
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1988No. 86-2620PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
834 F.2d 1488
10 Fed.R.Serv.3d 693
John S. HERRINGTON, David S. Herrington and Quail Hill
Ranch, a partnership, Plaintiffs/Appellees/Cross-Appellants,
v.
COUNTY OF SONOMA, Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 86-2620, 86-2728.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July 15, 1987.
Decided Dec. 24, 1987.
As Amended Feb. 10, 1988.
Jess S. Jackson, Barbara R. Banke, and Frederik A. Jacobsen, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs/appellees/cross-appellants.
James P. Botz, Santa Rosa, Cal., Antonio Cosby-Rossmann, Anita E. Ruud, San Francisco, Cal., for…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Silver Sage Partners, Ltd. v. City Of Desert Hot SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- S & M Investment Co. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1988
- Drovers Bank v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Clemens v. U.S. District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.