Legal Opinion

S & M Investment Co. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 7, 1988No. Civ. No. S-86-1215 EJGPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EDWARD J. GARCIA, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (“TRPA”)’s motion for partial summary judgment on counts 1, 2 and 3 of plaintiff’s complaint. Following oral argument, the court took the matter under submission, and upon further review of the briefs and authorities cited therein, the court now grants defendant’s motion for the reasons stated below.1

This action was originally filed in El Dorado County Superior Court and removed to this court based on federal question jurisdiction. The first two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. California Ex Rel. California Department of Transportation v. City of South Lake TahoeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1978
  2. Herrington v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Sederquist v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. S & M Investment Co., a California General Partnership v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, a Public Entity, Does I Through Xxx, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Fisher Controls International, Inc. v. MarroneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  3. (PS) Bryan v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API