Legal Opinion

Carey v. New England Organ Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 15, 2006PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

The plaintiffs in this case, Richard and Margaret Carey, seek recovery for the actions of the defendants, New England Organ Bank (the Organ Bank) and New England Eye & Tissue Bank (the Eye & Tissue Bank), and the parent organization of the Eye & Tissue Bank, Tissue Banks International (TBI).3 The claims arose from an unsuccessful attempt by the plaintiffs to donate the tissues of their deceased son for transplantation. The complaint in the Superior Court stated claims for negligence, misrepresentation, tortious interference with a dead body, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Harnish v. Children's Hospital Medical CenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Liss v. StudenyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. CraanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. Cowels (SJC 11630) Commonwealth v. MimsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  4. Yee v. Massachusetts State PoliceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  5. Cannonball Fund, Ltd. v. Dutchess Capital Management, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API