Traub v. Robertson-American Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBertram Harnett, J.
Few jurisdictional points attract as much interest and litigation as the susceptibility to suit of an unlicensed foreign corporation in a State in which it is not licensed to do business.
Two broad principles embrace the area. The first allows suit generally against an unlicensed foreign corporation actually doing business in the State. The second deals with a loosely defined area of lesser corporate presence them doing business; but, where, nevertheless, some corporate business has been transacted in the State. This second jurisdictional facet, colorfully denominated "long-arm,” permits suits…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc. v. FranklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Laufer v. OstrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bulova Watch Co., Inc. v. K. Hattori & Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Louis Marx & Co. v. Fuji Seiko Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Quick Erectors, Inc. v. Seattle Bronze Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1981
- Pneuma-Flo Systems, Inc. v. Universal MacHinery Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.