Pneuma-Flo Systems, Inc. v. Universal MacHinery Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
The due process era in jurisdiction, ushered in by International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945) and continued apace by decisions such as Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186, 97 S.Ct. 2569, 53 L.Ed.2d 683 (1977), has undoubtedly brought about a more equitable distribution of hardships arising when a local plaintiff seeks redress against a foreign defendant. This revolution, achieved through the repudiation of simple physical presence as the sine qua non of amenability to suit and substituting the forum…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. PeasleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Nordic Bank PLC v. Trend Group, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Ontel Products, Inc. v. Project Strategies Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Bialek v. Racal-Milgo, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Jacobs v. Felix Bloch Erben Verlag Fur Buhne Film Und Funk KGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.