Legal Opinion
Riumbau v. Colodner (In Re Colodner)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 13, 1992No. 18-12809PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTION FOR AN ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT
HOWARD SCHWARTZBERG, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Chapter 7 debtor, Jesse Colodner, has moved pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b), 12(b)(6) and 12(h)(2) for an order dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint which seeks: (i) to deny his discharge under 11 U.S.C. §§ 727(a)(2)(A), 727(a)(4)(A) and (B), 727(a)(5), and (ii) a determination as to the nondischargeability of their claims under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The Complaint
The plaintiffs are inventors who allegedly paid various fees to the debtor’s wholly-owned…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kugler v. HelfantSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Seymour Chalik, Debtor. Seymour Chalik v. Harold D. Moorefield, Jr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Barristers Abstract Corp. v. Caulfield (In Re Caulfield)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Krohn v. Cromer (In Re Cromer)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Rothman v. Beeber (In Re Beeber)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Kirk v. Hendon (In Re Heinsohn)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1999
- In Re BrienBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.