Legal Opinion
Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-Maatschappij
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 12, 1948PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves for “rehearing of the motions” decided March 5, 1948, 76 F.Supp. 335. It was then determined that plaintiff be permitted to further amend his second amended complaint, and the complaint as thus amended was dismissed on the ground that the claims therein asserted were barred by the three-year Statute of Limitations of New York, pertaining to claims for injury to property (N.Y.Civil Practice Act, § 49, subdiv. 7). Plaintiff was also denied permission to intervene herein as party plaintiff in his capacity as temporary receiver of the New York assets of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Bernstein v. N. v. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart - MaatschappijCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Ross v. WarnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Perlmutter v. ShatzerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1984
- Sauer v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.