Legal Opinion
Perlmutter v. Shatzer
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 18, 1984No. Civ.A. No. 78-526-NPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVID S. NELSON, District Judge.
This is a securities fraud action, brought under 15 U.S.C. § 78 and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 (“Rule 10b-5”), in which defendant seeks to raise a statute of limitations defense five years after the complaint was first answered. The questions to be decided are whether defendants’ motion for leave to amend their answer to include the statute of limitations defense, a motion which was allowed last October, should be reconsidered, and if so, whether it should now be denied.
After examining the procedural history of this case, I find…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kurt Strauss v. Douglas Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Emich Motors Corporation and U. S. Acceptance Corporation v. General Motors Corporation and General Motors Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Adam Farkas v. Texas Instruments, Inc. And Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Wyshak v. City National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Raney v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Woods v. Partenreederei M.S. Yankee ClipperDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
- In Re Cumberland Farms, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Haseotes v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001