International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Hechler
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
In Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck, 471 U. S. 202 (1985), this Court held that “when resolution of a state-law claim is substantially dependent upon analysis of the terms of *853an agreement made between the parties in a labor contract,” the plaintiff’s claim is pre-empted by §301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947 (LMRA), 61 Stat. 156, 29 U. S. C. §185. 471 U. S., at 220. The question presented by this case is whether a state-law tort claim that a union has breached its duty of care to provide a union member with a safe workplace is sufficiently independent of the collective-bargaining…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by455 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. RawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n Local Union No. 6Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
450 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.