Legal Opinion
Peeke v. Penn Central Transportation Company, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 16, 1975No. Civ. A. 72-1070PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EDWARD R. BECKER, District Judge.
The motion of Whiting Corporation for summary judgment requires us to consider the application of Pennsylvania’s statutes of limitations in products liability cases. The amended complaint alleges breach of warranty in the sale of a railroad “trackmobile,” a machine employed to draw boxcars along industrial sidings. 1 Defendant Whiting Corporation sold the trackmobile in question to the Allied Chemical & Dye Corporation, Barrett Division, predecessor in interest of the third party defendant Celotex Corporation, the plaintiff’s employer, on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Allan J. Jablonski v. Pan American World Airways, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Salvador v. Atlantic Steel Boiler Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Shadle v. PearceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of AmericaSuperior Court of Delaware · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.