Legal Opinion
Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of America
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided July 30, 1985PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPPITI, Judge.
The matters before the Court are three motions based upon statute of limitations issues in the above-captioned asbestos case. Defendant Raymark Industries, Inc. (“Ray-mark”) moves for judgment on the pleadings and defendants Herty Foundation (“Herty”) and Hollingsworth & Yose Co. (“Hollingsworth”) 1 move for summary judgment as to plaintiffs John and Anna Fernandez. This is the Court’s decision and order on these respective motions.
The essentia] facts are that on February 6, 1981 the initial complaint in this action was filed by Charles Merganthaler and John B. Fernandez and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Moore v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Hanger v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Marlowe v. Fisher BodyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Walters v. DitzlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tobias Chavez v. Dole Food Company IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Levey v. Brownstone Asset Management, LPSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Resource Ventures, Inc. v. Resources Management International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Energy Future Holdings v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Seidel v. LeeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.