Legal Opinion

Widdoes v. Laub

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 5, 1925No. Demurrer, No. 118PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

The precise question to be determined in this case is whether compensation for injuries to a minor, over fourteen years of age and under sixteen years of age, who is permitted to work under the provisions of the Child Labor Law in case an employment certificate or permit is obtained, but for whom no such certificate or permit is in fact procured, is embraced or governed by the terms and provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

It is, of course, apparent from the reading of Section 3193d of the Workmen’s Compensation Law that certain minors, *6un…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Karpeles v. . HeineNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Noreen v. William Vogel & Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. State Ex Rel. Short v. NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. AusbrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Krutlies v. Bulls Head Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Blancato v. Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Hill v. Moskin Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  3. Bartley v. CoutureSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
  4. Kenez v. Novelty Compact Leather Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. William B. Tilghman Co. v. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API