Legal Opinion
Kenez v. Novelty Compact Leather Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
The plaintiff suffered an injury which arose out of and in the course of his employment in the factory of the respondent-employer. He was at the time between fifteen and sixteen years of age and was employed in violation of the terms of a certain statute regulating the employment of children of his age. The commissioner finds that he secured this employment by incorrectly representing his age. This finding falls far short of charging the plaintiff with a fraudulent representation; Salt’s Textile Mfg. Co. v. Ghent, 107 Conn. 211, 215, 139 Atl. 694; and it is not claimed that the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Stetz v. F. Mayer Boot & Shoe Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Noreen v. William Vogel & Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Humphrees v. Boxley Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. AusbrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Rock Island Coal Mining Co. v. GilliamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Blancato v. Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Plecity v. George McLachlan Hat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Bartley v. CoutureSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
- Greenberg v. GuilianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.