Legal Opinion

Hill v. Moskin Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 2, 1960No. 18, 1960PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, C. J.:

This is a common-law action by the estate of a deceased employee against his former employer. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death occurring in the course of and as a result of the employment.

The facts are as follows:

David Baise, a youth seventeen years of age, was employed by Moskin on December 13, 1958, to act as “Frosty the Snowman” at Moskin’s clothing store on Market Street in Wilmington. His employment was intended to be temporary only, until Christmas, in connection with Christmas promotional activities. He was clad in a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Cunningham v. Northwestern Improvement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Le Tourneau v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1947
  4. Dancy v. Abraham Bros. Packing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Fritsch v. Pennsylvania Golf ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kofron v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. Saunders v. HillSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  3. Ianire v. University of DelawareSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
  4. Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of America, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1987
  5. Moss Rehab v. WhiteSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API