Legal Opinion

Heidebrink v. Moriwaki

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 4, 1984No. 5900-6-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.

Plaintiffs, Carol R. and Gary T. Heidebrink, were granted discretionary review of a trial court ruling denying production of a statement made by defendant, Nobuo Moriwaki, to his insurance company's investigator.

On March 15, 1982, Carol Heidebrink was driving her car west on Highway 17 on the outskirts of Moses Lake, Washington. Her vehicle was suddenly surrounded by a dense cloud of smoke which blinded her; her vehicle collided with the rear of a pickup truck. The Heidebrink car was one of several involved in a chain collision. The Heidebrinks allege the smoke was a direct result of Mr.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. In Re Special September 1978 Grand Jury (Ii). Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  4. Natta v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  5. Dike v. DikeWashington Supreme Court · 1968

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heidebrink v. MoriwakiWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. PavinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  3. State ex rel. Slusser v. BilletCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. Heidebrink v. MoriwakiWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Heidebrink v. MoriwakiWashington Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API