Legal Opinion
Bough v. Lee
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 24, 1939PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
Clarence E. Mellen, an attorney, appearing specially, moved under Rule 30(b), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to vacate and set aside a notice for the taking of his deposition and that of the Manufacturers’ Casualty Insurance Company through him. In the alternative he asks that the scope of his examination be limited so that he shall not be required to produce upon said examination the following paper referred to on said notice: “The original or copy of the statement given by the plaintiff, Margaret T. Bough to a representative of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCann v. New York Stock ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Brougham v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- Jones v. . ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Bough v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- In Re HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sandra K. Rucker, Herbert Rucker, Cheryl Dunham, Etc., and James Dunham v. Wabash Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Kenealy v. Texas Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Bifferato v. States Marine Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Jackson v. Kroblin Refrigerated Xpress, Inc.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1970
- Stark v. American Dredging Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.