Lamb v. Shoemaker
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed October 14, 1924:
Crownhart, J.
This case is the sequel to the case of Sicklesteel v. Edmonds, reported in 158 Wis. 122, 147 N. W. 1042. There the facts are set out in detail and may be referred to without repeating them here. In that case there were two appeals involving three parties out of a large number of litigants in the circuit court. This court there rendered judgment opening up the circuit court judgment for cross-complaints in favor of certain parties and against other parties, not before the court on appeal. This case is the result of a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cowie v. StrohmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Christianson v. Pioneer Furniture Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Pietsch v. McCarthyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Hunter v. BosworthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- John v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zeidler v. GoelzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- State ex rel. Littig v. Superior Court of Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Wisconsin Lumber & Supply Co. v. DahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Lisbon Town Fire Insurance v. CrosbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Northwestern Malleable Iron Co. v. McMahonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936