Legal Opinion

White Township School Directors Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1930No. Appeals, 34 and 37PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

This appeal is from an order apportioning the indebtedness between a new and an old school district. Exceptions were filed to the report of the commissioners appointed under the School Code of 1911, P. L. 309. The court below disposed of them under section 114 (P. L. 312) of the Code, which reads: “In case exceptions are filed to the report of such commissioners, the court shall dispose of the same, taking testimony therein, if it deems advisable, and the decision of the court thereon shall be final and binding on the several districts, without any right of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Twenty-First Senatorial District NominationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Sterrett v. MacLeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Walker's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Bedford v. RosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Commonwealth v. CicereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Grime v. Department of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. DeVito v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Rimer's Contested Election. Geary's App'l.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. In Re Elkland Leather Workers' Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API