Legal Opinion

Katherine Cunningham v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 17, 1970No. 433-60PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DURFEE, Judge.

This is a civil pay case in which both sides are moving for summary judgment.

In this pro se case, plaintiff seeks to recover salary and accumulated annual leave from the date of her resignation. She was employed as a mathematician at the Wright Air Development Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, from July 1956 until June 12, 1959, the effective date of her resignation. Plaintiff had submitted her written resignation to the Air Force on May 23, 1959, specifying on the standard form provided that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Albert Piccone v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Piccone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  4. Patrick F. X. McGucken v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  5. Raymond J. Hanifan v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Harvey M. Scharf v. Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. 55 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1675, 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,952 Julio M. Cruz v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Bishop v. TiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. Gratehouse v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Gulf States Manufacturers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API