Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Oregon Worsted Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 11, 1938No. 8675, 8676PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
Involved here are separate petitions of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of two orders issued against respondent under authority of section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(c).
Respondent is an Oregon corporation engaged in the business of manufacturing, selling, and distributing yarns and other woolen products. In case No. 8675 a charge was filed with the Board by the United Textile Workers of America, Local •No. 2435, alleging that respondent had engaged in certain unfair labor practices affecting commerce.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Oregon Worsted Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
3Cited by16 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. A. S. Abell Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. Biles-Coleman Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.