Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Oregon Worsted Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 28, 1938No. 8675, 8676PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

Respondent employer moves the court for an order requiring the petitioner to certify to the court a so-called report of respondent showing compliance with the recommendations of the trial examiner’s report.

The motion is based on the theory that since such report states that respondent has complied with the recommendations of the trial examiner, the case is ended and the Board has lost its jurisdiction to make any orders we are called upon to enforce, whether in addition to or modification of the recommendations.

We do not so hold to be the character of the recommendations…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. American Potash & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Elkland Leather Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Sterling Electric Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. Rivera v. Junta de Relaciones del TrabajoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Oregon Worsted Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API