McLiesh v. Ball
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King-county, Irwin, J., entered October 23, 1909, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an action to recover possession and quiet title to land.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
This is an action by the appellants to dispossess the respondents James Ball and Sarah Ball, his wife, of lots 28 and 29, block 167, Gilman’s addition to the city of Seattle, King county, Washington. The facts upon *691which the action is based, in brief, are as follows: On February 11, 1907, James G. Combs, who had been an attorney, for the respondents, brought an action against said respondents for attorney’s fees, and recovered a judgment in the sum of $95.60. On February 15, 1907, Combs filed a transcript of said judgment in the superior court of King county, Washington, and on March 5, 1907,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. BaldwinWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Spithill v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Vietzen v. OtisWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Povah v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hazel v. Van BeekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Hazel v. Van BeekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Symington v. HudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Byam v. AlbrightWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Gunstone v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.