Legal Opinion

Brown v. Baldwin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1907No. 6498PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clallam county, Hatch, J., entered April 3, 1906, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to quiet title.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

In the spring of 1899, the respondent was the owner of a certificate of stock in the Union Savings & Loan Association, of the par value of $5,000. The association denied any liability upon the stock, and the respondent brought suit against the association and recovered a judgment for the face value of the same. Upon appeal this judgment was reduced to $2,547 and interest. In July, 1899, and after the respondent had threatened to bring the aforesaid suit, the defendant association made a deed to appellant Baldwin, purporting to convey to him, among other tracts of land, the tract which is the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Filley v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Bates v. DrakeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Browder v. PhinneyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Spithill v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Ollar-Robinson Co. v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Finch v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Vietzen v. OtisWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. State ex rel. Barto v. Board of Drainage Commissioners of District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Carlson v. CurrenWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. McLiesh v. BallWashington Supreme Court · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API