Legal Opinion

Hazel v. Van Beek

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1998No. 65472-7PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

Lois Hazel foreclosed on real property of Leonard Van Beek to satisfy a judgment Hazel had won against Van Beek. Because Hazel failed to complete all steps of execution prior to the expiration of the statutory life of the judgment, we hold Hazel’s judgment expired and is unenforceable.

Lois Hazel hired Leonard Van Beek to remodel her home. Following a dispute over Van Beek’s work and purported overcharges, Hazel obtained a judgment for $59,081 against Van Beek in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Washington, at Seattle, No. 82-03969. The judgment was entered on…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Aslanidis v. United States Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Miebach v. ColasurdoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re Joan Morton, Debtor. Joan Morton v. National Bank of New York CityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. Erection Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Douchette v. Bethel School District No. 403Washington Supreme Court · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hazel v. Van BeekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Lachter v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of SappenfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. National Bank of Commerce Trust & Savings Ass'n v. HamNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. American Discount Corp. v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API