Legal Opinion

Snook v. Bowers

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2000No. S-8463, S-8464PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In these consolidated appeals, Russell Snook, Jr. challenges two decisions of the superior court. First, Snook appeals Judge Michael Thompson's grant of summary judgment to Wayne and Sheree Bowers. Judge Thompson decided that the Bowerses are the sole owners of a piece of property originally owned by the Shaan-Seet Native corporation and claimed by Snook. Second, Snook challenges Judge Thomas Jahnke's denial of his motion for relief from a stipulated judgment regarding ownership of the parcel. We affirm the decisions of both courts.

II. FACTS AND…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Unger v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Borg-Warner Corp. v. Avco Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hitt v. J. B. Coghill, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Johnson v. Alaska State Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. Tara, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. Fletcher v. South Peninsula HospitalAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Anderson v. PPCT Management Systems, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Douglas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API