Legal Opinion
United States v. Lawrence
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided October 24, 2002No. 4:02CR3080PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KOPF, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (filing 24) regarding the defendant’s motion to suppress (filing 11). No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and NELR 72.4, I have reviewed de novo the report and recommendation, together with the transcript of the evidentiary hearing that was conducted by the magistrate judge on September 26, 2002 (filing 23). I find that inasmuch as the magistrate judge has fully, carefully, and correctly found the facts and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Guy Christopher BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Anderson v. City of West Bend Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2011
- Mary E. Walters v. Paul FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Adrian Ramos Jr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2025
- Cotten v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.