Legal Opinion

Mary E. Walters v. Paul Freeman

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 16, 2014No. 13-14407UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Officer Paul Freeman appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment seeking qualified immunity in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Freeman asserts that he is entitled to qualified immunity because exigent circumstances justified his warrantless entry into Plaintiff Mary E. Walters’s home and his subsequent alleged use of force against her. Because, after careful review, we agree with the district court that no officer reasonably could have believed that exigent circumstances existed under the facts of this case viewed in the light most favorable to Walters, we…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Funderburk v. SnyderDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023
  2. Leach v. Sarasota CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
  3. Lucibella v. Town of Ocean RidgeDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
  4. Yancey v. TillmanDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API