Legal Opinion

State v. Day

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 18, 1986No. 85-023PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

In November 1983, defendant pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of burglary. In exchange for defendant’s plea, the prosecutor agreed to dismiss several other charges. A written plea agreement between defendant and a deputy state’s attorney recommended disposition in the following terms:

2-4 years; 18 months to serve beginning [November 28, 1983]; balance suspended; probation; pro-rata restitution in [amount] to be determined by Probation Dept, ([defendant] can contest [the amount] of same); any violation of parole or probation to be concurrent; [defendant] may withdraw plea if judge exceeds…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. TiptonIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Sherwin v. HoganSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  5. Carmo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. State v. WhitchurchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. State v. ByrneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  4. Reyes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999
  5. State v. FosterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API