Legal Opinion
Moore v. Hartman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 30, 2004No. Civil Action 92-2288 (RMU)PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Defendant’s Motion For a Ruling;' Denying the Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendant United States’ motion for a ruling on its motion to strike and for reconsideration of Judge Norma Holloway Johnson’s August 5, 2003 order denying summary judgment to the United States. 1 The defendant argues that Judge Johnson “inadvertently” failed to rule on the defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiffs statement of disputed material facts prior to denying the defendant’s motion for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Island Tile & Marble, LLC v. BertrandSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
- Wannall v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.