Cone v. Jones
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Per curiam
1. It affirmatively appears from the statement of facts herewith reported that the court has not ordered payment of any of the accounts or demands rendered. The court expressly refused to approve or disapprove for payment any of such demands on the application for an interlocutory injunction.
2. The Civil Code (1910), § 4872, provides that any such expenses “shall be paid out of the county treasury, . . upon the certificate of the judge of the superior court,” as a part of the expenses of the court. Chatham County v. Gaudry, 120 Ga. 121 (47 S. E. 634) ; Watkins v. Tift, 177 Ga. 640 (170 S. E.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chatham County v. GaudrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Long v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Watkins v. TiftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Georgia Public Service Commission v. Camel Lines Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- Behr v. City of MacOnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Wall v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- McLarty v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936