Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Tift

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 14, 1933No. Nos. 9309, 9310, 9320PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

It is declared by statute: “Except as provided in sections 416, 417, and 418 of the Civil Code, the grand jury may, when they deem it necessary, appoint any one or more citizens of the county, to inspect and examine, during vacation, the offices, papers, books, records, accounts, and vouchers of the court of ordinary for county purposes, clerk of the superior court, county treasurer, tax-collector, tax-receiver, county school commissioner, sheriff, and all other county officers; and if any of said officers be the custodians of county funds by virtue of their office, or have in their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chatham County v. GaudrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Freeney v. GeogheganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cone v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Richter v. Thomas County CommissionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Booth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. McLarty v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API