Legal Opinion

Wall v. Humphries

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1934No. 10032PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

In Remshart v. Savannah & Charleston Railroad Co., 54 Ga. 579, it was held: “Where a bill praying for injunction is clearly without equity, the chancellor may decline to order

*151the defendant to show canse against the application for a temporary injunction, and may refuse not only a restraining order but the injunction itself, upon mere inspection of the bill.” See, to the same effect, Connolly v. Morrison, 140 Ga. 492, 494 (79 S. E. 119). There was no error in refusing to entertain the present petition in so far as it sought an injunction against the distribution of the pamphlets by Humphries.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bailey v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  2. Connolly v. Atlantic Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Ponder v. ShumansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Loudermilk v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Long v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCluney v. StembridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API